Actos bladder
cancer lawsuits could
be headed for consolidation in a multidistrict litigation (MDL). Late last
month, plaintiffs in one such actos lawsuit
petitioned the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistriction Litigation for the
consolidation, requesting that all pending and future actos bladder cancer
lawsuits in federal courts be transferred to U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Illinois before Judge G. Patrick Murphy.An MDL allows lawsuits
associated with a particular product to be coordinated under one judge for
pretrial litigation to avoid duplicative discovery, inconsistent rulings and to
conserve the resources of the parties, witnesses and the court. When lawsuits
are consolidated as a multidistrict litigation, each retains its own identity.
Concerns about the potential risk of
bladder cancer from Actos first surfaced when it was discovered that rats given
the drug had a higher rate of bladder tumors. Recent results from an on-going
10 year study, involving nearly 200,000 patients with diabetes, suggests that
there may be a risk of bladder cancer from actos
side effects the longer the medication is
taken.Many have indicated that the FDA should remove
Actos from the market in the
United States as well, due to the risk of bladder cancer outweighing the
potential benefits provided by the medication.
Actos was approved by the FDA to treat Type 2 Diabetes in July, 1999. The medication has grown in popularity in recent years, after studies linked it’s primary competitor, Avandia, to an increased risk of heart attacks and death. Last year, Actos generated $4.3 billion in sales for Takeda Pharmaceuticals.
Actos was approved by the FDA to treat Type 2 Diabetes in July, 1999. The medication has grown in popularity in recent years, after studies linked it’s primary competitor, Avandia, to an increased risk of heart attacks and death. Last year, Actos generated $4.3 billion in sales for Takeda Pharmaceuticals.
Loss of consortium cases
have been filed by many spouses of Actos bladder cancer victims, alleging that
the side effects of the drug have caused their marital relations to suffer due
to the pain and suffering of their spouse. Loss of income due to a spouse being
unable to work may also be included in a loss of consortium lawsuit. Dozens of
Actos cases have been filed in various federal district courts throughout the
United States by individuals who have developed bladder cancer after taking the
type II diabetes drug. All of the complaints involve similar allegations that
Takeda Pharmaceuticals failed to warn of Actos side effects that could increase the risk of
bladder cancer.
No comments:
Post a Comment